Showing posts with label Babies. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Babies. Show all posts

Thursday, March 3, 2011

Breastfeeding Babies Exposed To Diabetes In Utero Protects Against Childhood Obesity


Breastfeeding a baby exposed to diabetes in utero may help protect that infant from becoming obese during childhood, according to a study published in the February issue of Diabetes Care and an accompanying editorial, which noted that population-wide detection and treatment of gestational diabetes takes on even greater importance due to these findings.

Babies that were breastfed for six months or more, after exposure to maternal diabetes in utero, were no more likely to put on extra weight as children (ages 6-13) than those who were not exposed to diabetes, the study found. This effect was not realized, however, for babies breastfed less than six months. The results were consistent across ethnicities.


"Our data suggest that breastfeeding promotion may be an effective strategy for reducing the increased risk of childhood obesity in offspring of mothers with diabetes during pregnancy," said Dr. Dana Dabelea, Associate Professor in the Department of Epidemiology, Colorado School of Public Health, and lead researcher on the study. "Since childhood obesity and in utero exposure to maternal diabetes have both been associated with later development of type 2 diabetes, it follows that breastfeeding these children may also help reduce their future risk for developing type 2. However, further research would be needed to confirm that added protection."


The study also suggests that the early postnatal period may be a critical period for determining future obesity and diabetes risk, the researchers concluded. "The macronutrient composition of breastmilk (i.e. protein, fat, carbohydrate) and bioactive substances not present in formula may influence metabolic programming and regulation of body fatness and growth rate," they wrote.


Previous research has shown that children born to mothers who had diabetes during pregnancy are more prone to childhood obesity than those who are not, perhaps because they are "programmed" to put on extra weight due to exposure to their mother's excessive glucose levels during these critical stages of prenatal development.


In an editorial accompanying this study, Dr. Andreas Plagemann, of the Clinic of Obstetrics, Division of Experimental Obstetrics, Charite-University Medicine Berlin, wrote that the study reinforced the importance of breastfeeding and of testing and treating pregnant women for diabetes "to enhance not only the prenatal but also the neonatal nutritional environment of the offspring."


"Beyond its important role for mother-child binding, breastfeeding as compared to formula has a considerable number of positive short and long term effects on human development, such as a decreased incidence of high respiratory infections, a lower risk of asthma and atopy, and a decreased risk of high blood pressure, type 2 diabetes as well as type 1 diabetes," he wrote. "Moreover, profound evidence exists that breastfeeding has the potential to permanently decrease the long-term risk of developing obesity, as shown by the results of at least for meta-analyses on this issue."


 

Friday, February 11, 2011

Solid Foods Before 4 Months Can Raise Obesity Risk For Bottle-Fed Babies



Bottle-fed babies who ate solid foods before the age of 4 months were six times more likely to be obese at the age of 3 years than those that started later, said US researchers who also found that the timing of solid food introduction made no difference in the case of breastfed babies.

You can read how Dr Susanna Y Huh of the Division of Gastroenterology, Children's Hospital Boston, Massachusetts, and colleagues, carried out their study, in the March issue of Pediatrics, the journal of the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP). An early edition appeared online on 7 February.


Huh and colleagues studied 847 children enrolled in Project Viva, which has been collecting data on a cohort of children from pre-birth onwards.


The main outcome measure they were interested in was obesity at age 3 years. This was defined as having a BMI (the child's weight in kilo divided by the square of the height in metres) equal to or above the 95th percentile on the standard growth chart for that age and gender.


The researchers also took note of when each child started having solid foods as a baby. They categorized this in three periods, before 4 months old, between 4 and 5 months old, and at 6 months old or later.


They analyzed the data for babies breastfed for at least 4 months (the "breastfed" group) separately from that on babies that were never breastfed or stopped breastfeeding before 4 months (the "formula-fed" group) and adjusted the results to take into account child and mother characteristics, including early infant growth.


The results showed that: 568 (67%) of the babies were breastfed and 279 (32%) were formula-fed for at least the first 4 months of their lives.
75 (9%) of the children were obese at age 3 years.
Among the breastfed babies, the timing of solid food introduction was not linked to risk of obesity (odds ratio OR 1.1, with 95% Confidence Interval CI ranging from 0.3 to 4.4).
Among the formula-fed babies, starting solid foods before the age of 4 months was linked to a six-fold increase in risk of being obese by age 3 years, and this was not explained by rapid early growth (OR after adjustment 6.3; 95% CI: 2.3-6.9).Huh and colleagues suggested sticking more closely to the guidelines on when to introduce babies to solid foods may reduce the risk of childhood obesity.

They also noted that about one in four babies in the US is never breastfed, and about half are breastfed for less than 4 months.


The AAP recommends waiting until babies are between 4 and 6 months old before introducing them to solid foods.


The World Health Organization (WHO) currently recommends that babies be exclusively breastfed for their first six months of life, with "continued breastfeeding along with appropriate complementary foods up to two years of age or beyond".


However, in a recent BMJ study, researchers said while they supported the WHO recommendation of six months exclusive breastfeeding for babies in countries where access to clean water and safer weaning foods may not be available to everyone, they questioned whether waiting so long was right for babies in the UK.


"Timing of Solid Food Introduction and Risk of Obesity in Preschool-Aged Children."
Huh, Susanna Y., Rifas-Shiman, Sheryl L., Taveras, Elsie M., Oken, Emily, Gillman, Matthew W.
Pediatrics, Published online 7 February 2011
DOI:10.1542/peds.2010-0740


Additional sources: American Academy of Pediatrics (press release, 7 Feb 2011), MNT Archives, WHO.


Written by: Catharine Paddock, PhD
Copyright: Medical News Today
Not to be reproduced without permission of Medical News Today

Bookmark and Share

Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.

posted by M McMahon on 9 Feb 2011 at 12:35 am

If the author of this piece doesn't know the diference between a study and an opinion piece (BMJ article on the introduction of solids quoted) then I'm afraid I won't be reading this website in future.


There have been NO new studies on weaning age and the science still clearly points to 6m exclusive breastfeeding as optimal. Please try not to take part the press campaign to undermine that message from the UK Govt and WHO


| post followup | alert a moderator |



All opinions are moderated before being added.


Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.


If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.


Contact Our News Editors


For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.

Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:






View the original article here

Friday, January 7, 2011

One Third Of US Babies Obese Or At Risk For Obesity



One third of US babies are obese or at risk for obesity, said researchers who monitored around 8,000 babies from 9 months to 2 years and also found that those were obese at 9 months had the highest risk of being obese at 2 years.

Dr Brian G. Moss, from the School of Social Work, Wayne State University in Detroit, Michigan, and Dr William H. Yeaton, from the Institute for Social Research at the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor, published their analysis of children's early weight trajectories from the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study-Birth Cohort (ECLS-B) in the January/February 2011 issue of the American Journal of Health Promotion, which is available online.


The ECLS-B draws from a nationally representative sample of American children born in the year 2001 and with diverse socioeconomic and racial/ethnic backgrounds.


The ECLS-B is one of the first to monitor the weight of a nationally representative sample of very young children.


For their study, Moss and Yeaton used ECLS-B early weight trajectories and related demographic characteristics of babies who were weighed when they were 9 months old (8,900 babies) and then again when they were 2 years old (7,500 babies).


They assessed whether the babies were of normal weight, at risk, or obese at 9 months, how this changed when they were 2 years old, and using statistical tools, examined whether the weight persistence, loss, or gain was linked to demographic characteristics (eg the child's sex, race/ethnicity, geographic region, socioeconomic status, community locale).


As there is no accepted standard of obesity for young children, the researchers put a child in the obese category if his or her weight was above the 95th percentile on standard growth charts.


Children in the 85th to 95th percentile were considered at risk for obesity.


When they analysed the results they found that: About one third (31.9%) of the babies were at risk for obesity or obese at 9 months.
The figure was slightly higher at 2 years (34.3% obese or at risk).
17% of the babies were obese at 9 months, rising to 20% at 2 years.
The babies who were obese at 9 months had the highest risk of being obese at 2 years.
44% of the babies who were obese at 9 months remained obese at 2 years.
Some babies were at greater risk for obesity (eg Hispanics, and those from low income families).
Others were at lower risk (eg females and Asian/Pacific Islanders).
40% of 2-year-olds from the lowest income homes were at risk or obese compared to 27% of those from the highest income homes.Moss and Yeaton concluded that:

"Between age 9 months and age 2 years, US children consistently moved toward less desirable weight status."


They suggested that since "obesity risk was not uniform across demographic subgroups ... health policy might focus on those children at greatest risk".


Moss told WebMD that:


"We are certainly not saying that overweight babies are doomed to be obese adults."


However, he said they did find evidence that being overweight at 9 months puts you on track for being overweight or obese later on in childhood.


There is also no suggestion here that babies should go on diets.


You should never deny the breast or the bottle while your baby is being exclusively breast or bottle fed, said childhood obesity expert Dr Joyce Lee, from the University of Michigan at Ann Arbor.


But when babies get onto solid food, that's when you have to be careful about food choices, she urged.


Lee told WebMD that the age at which children are introduced to junk food is getting younger.


"I know of 9-month-olds who eat French fries," she said.


You can make a big difference to your children's weight by keeping them off junk foods for as long as possible and making sure you give them plenty of fruits and vegetables, said Lee, who is an an assistant professor in pediatric endocrinology.


"Young Children's Weight Trajectories and Associated Risk Factors: Results From the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study-Birth Cohort."
Brian G. Moss and William H. Yeaton.
American Journal of Health Promotion: January/February 2011, Vol. 25, No. 3, pp. 190-198.
DOI: 10.4278/ajhp.090123-QUAN-29


Additional source: Salynn Boyles (31-Dec-2010), "Baby Fat May Predict Early Obesity", WebMD Health News.


Written by: Catharine Paddock, PhD
Copyright: Medical News Today
Not to be reproduced without permission of Medical News Today

Bookmark and Share

Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.


All opinions are moderated before being added.


Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.


If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.


Contact Our News Editors


For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.

Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:






View the original article here